Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Week 5 5.27
Sameness and fairness.
Everyone we’ve read so far for this class discusses the disparities in schools. There are disparities everywhere, from state aid to assessments, school demographic, everything!
After reading Dr. Tuck’s blog pertaining to the Abbott School Districts court case I was confused at first about why people would be in an uproar over the state giving the poor schools money in order to be equal with the rich schools, but then I started thinking critically about it and I made some realizations. I think there are two very different viewpoints on the issue of equality and social classes. I think there are two major ideas on this subject in terms of class and wealth. On one hand there is the belief and the notion that class and wealth should remain stagnant, the same concept of the Caste system in India. On the other hand there is a belief in upward mobility and the American dream.
I really enjoyed Malcom Gladwell’s talk, and I loved one of his final points about consumer products. Not only was Gladwell an excellent orator with a fascinating voice, I thought the way he compared industry with education was genius. He made a statement about spaghetti sauces that I thought was one of the best sentences I’ve ever heard about education, something that Howard Moscowitz is cited with inventing the concept of ‘horizontal segmentation’ According to Moscowitz, “mustard does not exist on a hierarchy, mustard exists just like tomato sauce on a horizontal plane, there is not good mustard or bad mustard, there is no perfect mustard or imperfect mustard. There are only different kinds of mustard that suit different kinds of people. He fundamentally democratized the way we think about taste...” I think this is a great way to view the classroom. I think it would be amazing if teachers viewed their students as all on one horizontal line: that all students are equal. There are just different variations of each individual. There is no “special ed” or “exceptional.” We as educators should just view our students as human beings. Unique human beings. We need to differentiate instruction in order to accommodate all of our students. Gladwell also said that all mustards are the same, no mustard should be more expensive then another, but the one mustard that is more expensive makes you want it more, it is something to aspire to. That is one of my core educational philosophies. I plan to hold my students to a very high standard. This is not just because I want to be a mean and difficult teacher but because I believe that if I demand the best I will receive the best. I think that an air of superiority in the room can only benefit my students to work their hardest.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
I finally cracked the code!!
Hanenda’s perspective on multiple literacies is very interesting. It correlates nicely with Stubbs and Baker. Hanenda discusses multiple forms of literacy and multiple ways of children expressing themselves. Multiple literacies can come in the form of artistic expression, diaries, and via technology: for example chat rooms, instant messenger, e-mailing, text messaging, blogs, cyber-simulated worlds, etc. “Based on the accounts provided by Lam (2000) and Yi (2005), it can be tentatively said that, outside school, adolescent ELLs strategically and agentively use literacy for their own personal purposes to express their personal feelings and opinions, seek and exchange information, maintain and develop social relations, construct desirable identities for themselves, act as language brokers for the family, and improve their English.” Hanenda poses the issue of incorporating out of school literacy with literacy in the classroom.
I think that technology can be a great solution to the problem of making ELL students literate. Keeping any type of online journal can be exciting and captivating for students. Assignments that incorporate ‘at-home literacies’ can be a great resource to bring into the classroom. The ultimate goal of literacy education is for students to become literate and teachers must try many different venues to achieve that goal.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Innovation
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Wrap uP
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Copyrightation
Here's something ridiculous that I learned: teachers can only use something they cited for two years, after that they have to get permission to use the source.
The Guidelines in order to stay within fair use are extremely limiting. It doesn't allow you to use very much of any resource.
Mrs. Murphy-Genter brought up a really good point that we have to be really careful and always protect ourselves in terms of citing and getting permission, I never thought about it before. I could potentially get in a lot of trouble, I really have to be more concious of this issue.
And I want to try to use second life but I still don't understand it. It's really confusing. I don't know if there is a glitch with my avitar, but i tried to put pants on her and her skirt won't go away and it's really annoying me! I can't get rid of the damn skirt! AHHH.
